LatentPress stores conversational histories and long documents as continuous memory tokens a frozen decoder reads through its input-embedding interface—no text reconstruction at inference. A small reader-matched writer (4.2M–26.2M adapter params, ~0.1% of the decoder) compresses 4–16×. On LongMemEval it reaches 0.504 accuracy at 7.70× compression vs 0.490 uncompressed, beating text summaries and OCR; writing is ~43ms per conversation and reading is 5–9× faster than raw context—useful for long-context agent memory.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓Rep: continuous memory tokens read via embedding interface; no text reconstruction.
  • ✓Compression: 4–16×; LongMemEval 0.504 at 7.70× vs 0.490 uncompressed.
  • ✓Speed: ~43ms write per conversation; reading 5–9× faster than raw context for long-context agents.
🧭

Turn your technical choice into a development budget

Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions

Action HubReady to adopt this in production?

Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.

Up NextLeCun and Balestriero turn the Platonic Representation Hypothesis into a theorem: a 109M text JEPA aligns with vision models better than 72B LLMs
Read Now→