OpenAI Codex lead Tibo (@thsottiaux) pushes back on burn-rate concerns: at roughly equivalent output, GPT-6 Astra is about ~50% cheaper per task than Sol. Paired with his earlier calibration that Astra on low already beats Sol on high, developers can dial effort down for cost control.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓Pricing: Astra ~50% cheaper per task than Sol at similar output.
  • ✓Calibration: lower effort tiers are often enough.
  • ✓Impact: helps Codex/ChatGPT users manage Astra quota burn.
⚡

Key Decision Metrics at a Glance

TL;DR Verdict
🏆 Benchmark RankRank
See how it ranks on the leaderboard
Full Leaderboard→
💰 Cost & PlansCompare
GPT-6 Astra · in: $10 / out: $50
Compare Plans↗
🛠️ Ecosystem & IDERules
GPT-6 Astra · GPT-5.6 Sol · Codex
Setup IDE Rules↗
🧭

Turn your technical choice into a development budget

Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions

⚔️ Compare Model→💰 Compare plans & limits↗
Action HubReady to adopt this in production?

Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.

⚔️ Launch VS Compare→💳 View Plans↗
Up NextOpenAI Codex lead: GPT-6 Astra on low beats GPT-5.6 Sol on high — dial effort down
Read Now→