@ArtificialAnlys published AA-Briefcase results: Grok 4.7 sits behind only Anthropic models, ranking just after Opus 5 at about half the cost per task. Versus Grok 4.6 on public AA-Briefcase-Lite due-diligence decks, Analytical Quality Elo rose 1698 to 1994 while Presentation Elo slipped 1531 to 1499. Example deck API cost: Grok 4.7 (xhigh) about $8 vs Grok 4.6 (xhigh) about $4.40.

Key Takeaways

  • ✓AA-Briefcase: Grok 4.7 is behind only Anthropic, just after Opus 5, at ~50% cost/task.
  • ✓Vs 4.6: Analytical Quality Elo 1698→1994; Presentation Elo 1531→1499.
  • ✓Example decks: Grok 4.7 (xhigh) ~$8 vs Grok 4.6 (xhigh) ~$4.40.
Artificial Analysis: Grok 4.7 ranks just behind Anthropic on AA-Briefcase at ~50% Opus 5 cost/task
🖼️Official Media
Click to view high-res
⚡

Key Decision Metrics at a Glance

TL;DR Verdict
🏆 Benchmark RankRank
AA-Briefcase: Grok 4.7 is behind only Anthropic, just after Opus 5, at ~50% cost/task.
Full Leaderboard→
💰 Cost & PlansCompare
Grok 4.7 · in: $2 / out: $6
Compare Plans↗
🛠️ Ecosystem & IDERules
Grok 4.7 · Artificial Analysis · AA-Briefcase
Setup IDE Rules↗
🧭

Turn your technical choice into a development budget

Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions

⚔️ Compare Model→💰 Compare plans & limits↗
Action HubReady to adopt this in production?

Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.

⚔️ Launch VS Compare→💳 View Plans↗
Up NextArtificial Analysis releases AA-Omniscience v1.1: 3,000 refreshed questions and a calibrated 300-question public set, with Gemini 4 Carbon leading at a Net Score of 54
Read Now→