At 03:56 Singapore time on November 14, former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon (@hilbertspaess) posted a slide from Anthropic's IPO roadshow on X and said it was a big factor in his decision to leave. His reading: the slide shows pretraining compute efficiency over time on a log-scale y-axis, and the curve is still bending upward, which he calls continued superexponential algorithmic progress, with Mythos just one point on that curve. At the time of writing the post has about 1.19M views, 5,212 likes and 321 replies, and X lists the controversy among its trending stories. Critics point out the chart has no axis labels or numbers. This piece covers one person's interpretation and community reactions, not an official Anthropic conclusion.
Key Takeaways
- ✓Coxon's post: "This slide from the Anthropic IPO roadshow was a big factor in my decision to leave," calling the y-axis a log scale and the progress superexponential; about 5,212 likes, 444 reposts and 321 replies (post)
- ✓He argues Mythos was not a one-time jump but a point on a superexponential curve, and that Anthropic "could already retrain Mythos with a fraction of the compute originally needed"; he adds this does not strictly imply a software-only intelligence explosion, since R&D spending has also grown
- ✓To critics who say the chart has no numbers or units, he replied that compute multipliers are unitless so relative distances still mean something, and that comparing the gain after Mythos with the gain before it needs only three data points (reply)
- ✓He says he will not break his NDA to share absolute numbers, citing the trust between Anthropic and its employees, and in a follow-up he argued for pausing frontier development next year, saying it would only hurt OpenAI and Anthropic
- ✓This is one person's reading: Anthropic has not publicly responded to Coxon's claims, and the slide's actual values have not been published
Key Decision Metrics at a Glance
Turn your technical choice into a development budget
Compare 40 dev plans & simulate token costs vs $20/mo subscriptions
Project Links & Resources
Direct AccessIn-Depth Technical Analysis
Background
Anthropic is on its IPO roadshow, and every chart in the investor materials is being picked apart. Early on November 14 (Singapore time), former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon posted one roadshow slide on X, said it was "a big factor" in his decision to leave, and said he was surprised the company made it public. The post quickly reached about 1.19M views and 5,212 likes, and X grouped the controversy into a trending story about the Anthropic IPO chart.
What the slide shows, per Coxon
In Coxon's reading, the slide plots pretraining compute efficiency: how much less raw compute is needed for the same model quality. The y-axis is a log scale and the curve is still bending upward, which he takes as superexponential algorithmic progress. Mythos, he says, was not a one-off breakthrough but a point on that curve, and Anthropic could already retrain Mythos with a fraction of the original compute. He adds that this does not strictly mean a software-only intelligence explosion, since R&D spending has also grown, but argues that algorithmic gains do not need rare genius and are close to being automated.
Numbers that matter
This is not a benchmark, and the slide has no published values; Anthropic has not released them. Some critics point out the chart has no labels or units. Coxon replied that compute multipliers are unitless, so relative distances still matter, and that comparing the gain after Mythos with the gain before it needs only three data points. He says he will not break his NDA to share absolute numbers, out of respect for the trust between the company and its employees. The verifiable numbers are the post metrics: about 1.19M views, 5,212 likes, 444 reposts and 321 replies.
What developers should take from it
For developers, the point is this: if pretraining efficiency really keeps accelerating, a given level of capability gets cheaper faster, and today's flagship abilities could reach smaller, cheaper models sooner. But this is one former employee's interpretation, and Anthropic has not publicly responded. In follow-up posts Coxon also argued for pausing frontier development next year, which is his personal position. For real tool and model choices, rely on official releases, pricing and hands-on results.
Benchmark side-by-side against alternatives, or calculate monthly token cost vs subscription break-even.
Discussion & Comments
0Sign in to join the discussion
Connect with AI developers to exchange benchmark insights.