AI Coding Live News

Cognition scores Gemini 4 Carbon at 40% on FrontierCode 2.0 for $4.04 a task, near the top, while Gemini 4 Argon gets 26.3% at $6.41

Cognition, the company behind Devin, posted on X at 01:45 UTC on Oct 30 that Google's new Gemini 4 Carbon scores 40% on its FrontierCode 2.0 coding benchmark at $4.04 per task, near the top and behind only Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Sonnet 5.5. The earlier Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% at a higher $6.41 per task. The results are Cognition's own runs, and the leaderboard on its site has been updated.

Cognition scores Gemini 4 Carbon at 40% on FrontierCode 2.0 for $4.04 a task, near the top, while Gemini 4 Argon gets 26.3% at $6.41

Key Takeaways

  • Gemini 4 Carbon scores 40% on FrontierCode 2.0 at $4.04 per task, behind Claude Opus 5.5 (45.5%), GPT-6 Astra (42.8%) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (post)
  • Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% at $6.41 per task, ahead of Muse Wonder 1.0 but behind Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7
  • From Argon to Carbon the score rises about 13.7 points while cost per task drops about $2.37
  • The changelog shows Gemini 4 Carbon was added on Oct 28; FrontierCode 2.0 has 132 tasks scored on whether a maintainer would merge the PR (leaderboard)
  • All figures are Cognition's own runs; Google has not published FrontierCode results itself
Read full story

Mistral releases the open weights of Mistral Large 4 "Le Chonk": a 1T-total, ~52B-active multimodal MoE that Mistral says leads open models on FrontierCode 2.0

On Oct 29 Mistral released an improved Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk) with open weights on Hugging Face (plus an NVFP4 quantized checkpoint), served on its API as mistral-large-4. After about three more weeks of reinforcement learning since the early-October preview, Mistral reports 19.7% on FrontierCode 2.0, Terminal-Bench 4.0 up from 28% to 41%, and new low/medium/high reasoning modes. The license is a modified MIT that allows commercial use, but running a model-as-a-service business needs a separate commercial license.

Mistral releases the open weights of Mistral Large 4 "Le Chonk": a 1T-total, ~52B-active multimodal MoE that Mistral says leads open models on FrontierCode 2.0

Key Takeaways

  • Specs: about 1T total parameters with 49B active per token (about 52B including embeddings and output layers), 128 routed experts with 4 active plus 1 shared expert, 1M context, text and image input
  • Per Mistral: 19.7% on Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0, ahead of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 19.3% and GLM-5.3 at 17.8%, first among open models
  • 48% on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, roughly tied with GLM-5.3 while using 47% fewer tokens per task on average; Terminal-Bench 4.0 rose from 28% in preview to 41%
  • 51% on the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index, and a 96.6% average refusal rate on malicious cyber requests, which Mistral says is the highest among open models
  • Trained from scratch on 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European datacenters; in Surge Code blind pairwise tests it ranked behind only Claude Opus 5.5
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:

Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5: 60% private test sets, Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58 and the open-weights gap widens to 12 points

On Oct 28 independent evaluator Artificial Analysis released Intelligence Index v5, its biggest revision since v4 in January: it adds Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 and Terminal-Bench-Science, swaps Humanity's Last Exam for HLE-Diamond, and now draws 60% of its weight from private or held-out test sets. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 58, ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 57 and GPT-6.1 Sol at 55; the top open-weights model, Kimi K3.1 Pro (weights not yet released), scores 46, widening the gap from 3 points in v4.3 to 12. It also launched Progress Index v1 for comparing models across years.

Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5: 60% private test sets, Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58 and the open-weights gap widens to 12 points

Key Takeaways

  • Overall (vendor-reported by Artificial Analysis): Claude Opus 5.5 (max) 58, GPT-6 Astra (max) 57, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) 55; Anthropic and OpenAI hold the top five, with Gemini 4 Argon (high) next at 50
  • The open-weights gap grows from 3 to 12 points: Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 46, while released-weight leaders DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM-5.3 (max) score 32, below Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) at 36
  • Cost per task varies more than 13x: among the top 10, GPT-6.1 Terra (max) is cheapest at $0.96 and Claude Fable 5.1 (max) priciest at $13.04; GPT-6.1 Sol trails Opus 5.5 by 4 points at about one eighth the cost ($1.27 vs $10.04)
  • Four categories at 25% each: Knowledge Work, Coding (FrontierCode 2.0 15%, Terminal-Bench 4.0 10%), Science and General; GDPval-AA v2.1, SciCode and AA-LCR were removed
  • Tasks are heavier: median output tokens per task rose from 35k to 59k, and effort matters more, with Opus 5.5 scoring 35 at low effort vs 58 at max for 10x the cost
Read full story

Cognition launches FrontierCode 2.0 coding benchmark: it asks whether a PR should be merged, and top model Claude Opus 5.5 scores just 45.5%

Cognition, the maker of Devin, released FrontierCode 2.0 on Oct 27. It keeps the method of maintainer-written tasks graded on whether the code is actually mergeable, but draws tasks from more repositories, adds security patches and performance work, uses deliberately underspecified prompts and adds many thoroughness criteria. In Cognition's results Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 45.5%, GPT-6 Astra follows at 42.8%, and Grok 4.7 and Gemini 4 Argon drop into the 20s, leaving the benchmark far from saturated.

Cognition launches FrontierCode 2.0 coding benchmark: it asks whether a PR should be merged, and top model Claude Opus 5.5 scores just 45.5%

Key Takeaways

  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 45.5% (54.6% on v1.1) and GPT-6 Astra scores 42.8% (53.3% on v1.1), per Cognition (vendor-reported)
  • Grok 4.7 scores 28.6%, Gemini 4 Argon 26.3%, Muse Wonder 1.0 24.3%, SWE-2 23.9%, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 19.3% and Kimi K3 17.7%, showing a wide gap for open models
  • Versus v1.1, reference solutions touch 67% more files and 89% more lines in codebases 25% larger; tasks come from 55% more repositories with 43% more blocking criteria
  • Thoroughness blockers grew from 168 to 501, about 3x; in 80% of tasks the reference solution improves on the upstream PR, and an audit agent found and reported an upstream security vulnerability
  • On the cost-score Pareto frontier, Opus 5.5 sits at the high end and Luna, Haiku and Sol at the low-cost end, with GPT-6.1 Sol called out for strong value (official blog)
Read full story
ADSponsored

Artificial Analysis launches Coding Agent Index v2.0: FrontierCode from Cognition replaces DeepSWE, and Claude Code with Opus 5.5 leads at 61.7

On 2026-10-23 Artificial Analysis launched Coding Agent Index v2.0, which scores model-plus-harness combinations across 290 tasks with three equally weighted benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1 from Cognition (100 tasks on real open-source repos, graded on whether a maintainer would merge the change) replaces DeepSWE v1.1, SWE-Atlas-QnA becomes the stricter SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA, and Terminal-Bench 4.0 is unchanged. Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 61.7, ahead of Sonnet 5.5 at 59.3 and Muse Wonder Full at 58.9. Scores fall across the board: the 21 configurations measured on both versions drop from a mean of 54.8 to 47.4.

Artificial Analysis launches Coding Agent Index v2.0: FrontierCode from Cognition replaces DeepSWE, and Claude Code with Opus 5.5 leads at 61.7

Key Takeaways

  • Top of the index: Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 (max) 61.7, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) 59.3, Muse Code with Muse Wonder Full (max) 58.9, Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback) 57.6 (Artificial Analysis figures)
  • On FrontierCode v1.1, Opus 5.5 scores 56.0%, ahead of Codex with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 52.6%; 15 of 24 configurations sit between 43% and 49%
  • Version shift: 21 configurations average 54.8 on v1.5 and 47.4 on v2.0, with 20 of 21 moving down; the same set averages 45.1% on FrontierCode versus 65.6% on DeepSWE
  • Four points on the cost frontier: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 47.3 at $0.39 per task, GPT-6.1 Sol 54.1 at $1.50, GPT-6 Astra 54.7 at $7.04, Opus 5.5 61.7 at $11.42 (pay-per-token API costs, not subscriptions)
  • SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA rewords 127 of 1,306 rubric criteria and uses GPT-6 Luna (xhigh) as judge with five votes per criterion; dataset and judge config are on Hugging Face
Read full story

Cognition: GPT-6 Astra coming to Devin; near Fable 5 on FrontierCode at 64% lower cost

Cognition says GPT-6 Astra is coming to Devin. On FrontierCode 1.1, Astra is within 0.4 points of Fable 5 at ~64% lower cost, and sets a new SOTA on Cognition’s internal testing benchmark with more comprehensive tests, clearer reports, and better video evidence.

Key Takeaways

  • Astra is coming to Devin for autonomous software engineering workflows.
  • FrontierCode 1.1: within 0.4 points of Fable 5 at ~64% lower cost.
  • New SOTA on Cognition’s internal testing bench: fuller tests, clearer reports, better video evidence.
Read full story

Cognition: Devin ships Fable 5.1; Fusion matches it on FrontierCode at ~47% lower cost

Cognition announced Claude Fable 5.1 in Devin. With Anthropic’s cache pricing change, Fable-level intelligence is about 54% cheaper—even undercutting Opus. Devin’s Fusion harness matches Fable 5.1 on FrontierCode at roughly 47% lower cost, folding the new model into production agent workflows.

Key Takeaways

  • Devin now runs Claude Fable 5.1 for coding agents.
  • Cache pricing makes Fable-class capability ~54% cheaper, undercutting Opus on cost.
  • Fusion matches Fable 5.1 on FrontierCode at ~47% lower cost for scaled agent runs.
Read full story

Google DeepMind Launches Gemini 3.7 Flash as Workhorse Model for Coding and Agents

Google DeepMind released Gemini 3.7 Flash, delivering massive gains in agentic coding and debugging (FrontierCode 43.6%, DeepSWE 65.3%) with Day-0 availability in Antigravity and AI Studio at introductory rates.

Key Takeaways

  • Substantial accuracy gains over 3.6 Flash on complex debugging, issue resolution, and single-shot UI layouts;
  • Benchmark scores: FrontierCode 1.1 jumps to 43.6% (vs 34.4%) and DeepSWE v1.1 to 65.3% (vs 49.0%);
  • Day-0 integration in Antigravity, AI Studio, and Android Studio at promotional $0.75 / $3.75 per 1M rates.
Read full story