AI Coding Live News

OpenAI Shares Progress on ChatGPT and Codex for Hardware Engineering: GPT-6 Astra Designs a Codex Device in Under a Week, Mazda Joins for Aerodynamics Research

On November 3, OpenAI published "Accelerating engineering for the physical world," describing how its models help with mechanical design, electrical design and simulation. Two employees used GPT-6 Astra to design a device for talking to Codex (enclosure, PCB, firmware and software) in under a week, and a contract manufacturer built a small prototype batch in under a month, though manufacturing readiness still took several rounds of human review. Token usage across OpenAI hardware teams has grown 23-fold since February. On BenchCAD 2.0, a newer internal model averaged 0.875 versus 0.594 for GPT-6 Astra at its highest reasoning setting (OpenAI-reported). OpenAI is also expanding its work with Chip Ganassi Racing and announced a new research collaboration with Mazda.

OpenAI Shares Progress on ChatGPT and Codex for Hardware Engineering: GPT-6 Astra Designs a Codex Device in Under a Week, Mazda Joins for Aerodynamics Research

Key Takeaways

  • In a test with no direct human edits, GPT-6 Astra handled the look, enclosure structure, component selection, PCB layout, UI and firmware; two employees finished the design in under a week as a side project, and prototypes came back in under a month, per the OpenAI blog.
  • OpenAI names the gaps: Astra did not consistently account for the manufacturer's production limits, tolerances or assembly details, so manufacturing readiness took several rounds of review.
  • OpenAI hardware and infrastructure teams use Codex and ChatGPT for CAD models, 2D manufacturing drawings, simulation and FEA setup, and design reviews; token usage has grown 23-fold since February (OpenAI-reported).
  • BenchCAD 2.0 (reconstructing 3D parts and assemblies, identifying circuit-board connections): a newer internal model scored 0.875 versus 0.594 for GPT-6 Astra at its highest reasoning setting (OpenAI-reported; the internal model is unnamed and unreleased).
  • Collaborators: Chip Ganassi Racing is testing 3D-scan-to-editable-CAD and 2D drawing workflows; Mazda is working with OpenAI researchers on airflow and structural simulations for vehicle design, with results promised "in the coming months."
Read full story

Sarvam Releases Prism, an Open-Weight Decision Model Built on Sarvam 105B That Returns Calibrated Option Probabilities in About 44 ms, Apache 2.0

Indian AI company Sarvam released Sarvam Prism on November 3, a "System One" decision model for enterprise workflows: given a context and questions with fixed answer options, it returns a probability for every option in a single forward pass instead of generating text. Sarvam says that across the 25 decision models it tested, Prism averages 71.8 over three indices with a median response time of 44 ms on one B200, the highest score under 100 ms, and scores 82.5 on its Indian-language benchmark. Weights are on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0, with a hosted API as well. All scores are Sarvam's own measurements.

Sarvam Releases Prism, an Open-Weight Decision Model Built on Sarvam 105B That Returns Calibrated Option Probabilities in About 44 ms, Apache 2.0

Key Takeaways

  • Trained on the Sarvam 105B (105B-10B MoE) base; it only outputs option probabilities, so the answer is always one of the given options.
  • Vendor-reported indices: Jev Decision Index 67.0, Sarvam's recreation of the Artificial Analysis decision index 65.9, internal Indian-language benchmark 82.5, average 71.8; Perplexity Decider v1.2 averages 68.0 at about 117 ms.
  • Calibration: on English answers at 90%+ confidence it expects 3.3% errors and makes 2.2%; in Indian languages 5.4% expected vs 4.4% actual, while rivals underestimate errors by 1.5x to 4.8x.
  • By sorting options into a fixed order before scoring, it changed 0 of 2,000 answers across four shuffled option orders.
  • On 700 recorded agent runs it judges correctly 78.5% of the time overall, vs 70.7% for Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • Self-hosting needs one FP8-capable GPU with about 120 GB free memory (such as B200 or H200) and about 106 GB of disk for weights.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Sarvam Prism⚡ Sarvam 105B⚡ Perplexity Decider v1.2⚡ Jev 1.14⚡ Microsoft-Decision-1⚡ Claude Haiku 5.5🌐 Sarvam

Hume Launches Audio Decision API: Ask Plain-Language Questions of Raw Audio in One Call, 70.7% Agreement With a Human Panel per Hume

On November 2 voice AI company Hume launched the Audio Decision API, which it calls the first audio-native model that answers questions about speech and sound. Developers upload raw audio, write each question as a sentence with candidate answers, and get back a probability for each answer, with no transcription step. It supports yes/no, multiple-choice, rating-scale and time-span questions, such as how many speakers there are, whether someone laughs, whether a caller sounds frustrated, or whether a siren is in the background. Per Hume, it was trained on more than 10 million human judgments and in an initial evaluation reached 70.7% agreement with a human panel's average judgment, versus 56.5% for an individual rater. Access is currently by request or waitlist.

Hume Launches Audio Decision API: Ask Plain-Language Questions of Raw Audio in One Call, 70.7% Agreement With a Human Panel per Hume

Key Takeaways

  • Per Hume: 70.7% agreement with a human panel's average judgment in an initial evaluation, versus a 56.5% individual-rater baseline; sample size and languages were not disclosed.
  • Trained on more than 10 million human perceptual judgments (per Hume's X post); the blog cites tens of millions of listener ratings overall.
  • Four question types (yes/no, choice, scale, span); adding a question is one line of JSON, with no labeling or retraining.
  • The endpoint is POST /v0/decisions/file, plus an input-token estimate endpoint, with Python and TypeScript SDKs.
  • Hume says work that used to take 10+ models now takes one call; pricing has not been published.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Hume Audio Decision Model🌐 Hume AI

OpenAI Launches Grid Protectors Program: Future Compute Campuses Will Cut Power When Grids Are Strained, Starting With Up to 1,000 MW in Georgia

On November 2, OpenAI announced the Grid Protectors Program on its official blog: working with utilities and regulators so its future self-built compute campuses (its new term for data centers) cut electricity use when the grid is strained, while paying the full infrastructure and electric-service costs. The pilot is the planned campus in Effingham County, Georgia (Project Camellia), which Georgia Power says needs about 3,200 MW and commits up to 1,000 MW of flexible demand response, equal per OpenAI to the average use of roughly 700,000 households. The campus is still in development.

OpenAI Launches Grid Protectors Program: Future Compute Campuses Will Cut Power When Grids Are Strained, Starting With Up to 1,000 MW in Georgia

Key Takeaways

  • The Effingham campus (Project Camellia) needs about 3,200 MW, and Georgia Power can cut up to 1,000 MW of supply to it during peaks under a 25-year agreement (Georgia Power figures).
  • OpenAI says 1,000 MW equals the average demand of roughly 700,000 households, more than Washington, D.C., and Boston combined.
  • Georgia Power projects about $950 million a year in customer savings from 2029 from its large-load portfolio including this project, at least $15 a month for a typical home.
  • OpenAI commits to paying the full grid infrastructure and electric-service costs; terms for other campuses will be shared once finalized.
  • OpenAI cites a projection that U.S. data center capacity will exceed 100 GW by 2030.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
ADSponsored

X Discussion: Jason Calacanis Says Under $40K a Year in AI Subscriptions Delivers $2M+ in Value and Has Automated at Least Seven Full-Time Jobs

Angel investor and This Week in Startups host Jason Calacanis posted on X on November 2 that he spends under $40K a year on tokens and subscriptions from Anthropic, Lovable, Grok Bot, ElevenLabs and other AI products, yet gets more than $2M in value at LAUNCH and This Week in Startups. He said they have automated at least seven full-time jobs and become 100% faster at the average task, and that the last 90 days changed more than the previous two years. Within about 9 hours the post drew about 2,200 likes and 230K views, with debate centered on AI ROI and job replacement. All figures are his own claims and have not been independently verified.

Key Takeaways

  • This is Calacanis's personal post, not official data or an announcement from any AI company; the $40K, $2M, seven jobs and 100% faster figures are self-reported with no public breakdown.
  • The original post (2026-11-02 05:27 UTC) had about 2,201 likes, 106 reposts, 244 replies, 42 quotes, 230K views and 715 bookmarks at fetch time.
  • Tools he named include Anthropic, Lovable, Grok Bot and ElevenLabs plus a long tail of other products; he also said anyone who has not used the last 90 days of products for at least 30 hours a week has no idea how profound this software is.
  • Supporters: entrepreneur Steven Cohn (@spcohn) quoted it saying his team has seen the same level of ROI; Farzad (@farzyness), with about 400K followers, quoted it saying "The ROI for AI is mind-boggling," drawing about 157 likes.
  • Skeptics: one user mocked posting "we automated seven full-time jobs" with a siren emoji like a product launch, noting that 30 hours a week of usage is itself like a new full-time job.
Read full story

Microsoft Open-Sources Mage-VL-Cowork, a 4B Computer-Use Agent That Chooses Between Clicking the GUI and Running Bash, Scoring 66.0% on OSWorld-Verified

On October 30, Microsoft's Mage team released Mage-VL-Cowork on Hugging Face under Apache-2.0: a 4B multimodal computer-use agent in which a single model decides at every step whether to act through screenshots and GUI clicks (computer_use) or through bash and Python in a terminal, with no external orchestrator. Microsoft reports a two-run average of 66.0% on OSWorld-Verified (361 tasks, 50-step budget), above Qwen3.6-27B at 63.9% but below the 9B SCALECUA-Qwen3.5-9B at 68.7%.

Microsoft Open-Sources Mage-VL-Cowork, a 4B Computer-Use Agent That Chooses Between Clicking the GUI and Running Bash, Scoring 66.0% on OSWorld-Verified

Key Takeaways

  • 4B parameters, built on Mage-VL (Mage-ViT vision encoder plus Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507); about 9.48 GB of bf16 weights under Apache-2.0.
  • On OSWorld-Verified, two independent runs scored 65.33% and 66.75% for a 66.0% average; 87.5% on operating-system tasks and 62.7% on multi-app workflows.
  • In Microsoft's side-by-side, a LibreOffice Calc chart task took 39 seconds (6 steps) via Python in the terminal, versus 9:56 (39 steps) for GUI-only Qwen3.6-27B.
  • Online RL adds 10.16 points over hybrid SFT while cutting mean model calls by 13.0% and output tokens by 25.4%.
  • Training data came from Mage-CUA-Forge, which synthesized about 294K desktop and web tasks across 6,915 skills and cut per-task generation cost from $0.906 to $0.158.
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Mage-VL-Cowork⚡ Mage-VL⚡ Qwen3-4B⚡ Qwen3.6-27B🌐 Microsoft

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

On Nov 2, semiconductor and AI research firm SemiAnalysis released GDPx, a benchmark of agentic capability across 11 domains: chip design, cybersecurity, biology, finance, legal, quant trading, recursive self-improvement (RSI), hardware design, materials science, alignment and software engineering. Its 206 tasks were built by 14 specialist data partners, with SemiAnalysis doing final QA. On the official leaderboard Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 12.0%, followed by Gemini 4 Carbon at 10.9% and GPT-6 Astra at 9.6%; nearly every model scores 0 on finance and legal. SemiAnalysis says safety classifiers drag down Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, and plans a new version every 3–6 months. All scores are as reported by SemiAnalysis.

SemiAnalysis releases GDPx, an agentic benchmark of 206 tasks across 11 high-value domains where the top model, Claude Opus 5.5, scores just 12%

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: 11 domains, 14 data partners and 206 tasks, with a default time limit of 8 hours per task (GDPx site)
  • Leaderboard (as reported by SemiAnalysis): Claude Opus 5.5 12.0%, Gemini 4 Carbon 10.9%, GPT-6 Astra 9.6%, Muse Wonder Full 9.0%, Claude Fable 5.1 8.5%, GPT 6.1 Sol 8.4%, Claude Sonnet 5.5 8.2%
  • Lower tier and open weights: DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 5.4%, GPT-6 Luna 5.1%, Grok 4.7 3.9%, GLM 5.3 2.7%; almost every model scores 0 on finance and legal
  • Method: each model runs in its native harness where one exists (Claude Code for Opus, Codex for Astra, Antigravity for Carbon), otherwise OpenCode; the headline is pass@1 over three attempts with all domains weighted equally (SemiAnalysis blog)
  • By domain: Opus 5.5 wins quant trading, hardware and chip design; Gemini 4 Carbon wins biology and software engineering; GPT-6 Astra wins RSI and materials science; Muse Wonder Full is the strongest cyber model
Read full story

Artificial Analysis releases AA-Omniscience v1.1: 3,000 refreshed questions and a calibrated 300-question public set, with Gemini 4 Carbon leading at a Net Score of 54

On October 31, independent evaluator Artificial Analysis released AA-Omniscience v1.1, its knowledge and hallucination benchmark and part of Intelligence Index v5. The question set shrinks from 6,000 to 3,000, dropping previously public and saturated questions, fixing errors and ambiguities, and adding new ones, and a new 300-question public set on Hugging Face is calibrated to the private set's difficulty, with 0.99 Pearson and Spearman correlation on Net Score. Gemini 4 Carbon (high) leads with a Net Score of 54, ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 48 and Claude Fable 5.1 at 46; Fable 5.1 has the highest accuracy (68%) and Gemini 4 Argon the lowest hallucination rate (4%). Models score about 1.9 points lower than on v1 on average, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash drops 22 points. All figures are as reported by Artificial Analysis.

Artificial Analysis releases AA-Omniscience v1.1: 3,000 refreshed questions and a calibrated 300-question public set, with Gemini 4 Carbon leading at a Net Score of 54

Key Takeaways

  • The question set shrinks from 6,000 to 3,000 across 6 domains and 42 topics: 600 each for science/engineering/math and software engineering, 450 each for finance, health, humanities/social sciences and law
  • A new 300-question public set is on Hugging Face, with 0.99 correlation to private-set Net Score and a median difference of 0.0 points
  • Net Score ranking: Gemini 4 Carbon (high) 54, Claude Opus 5.5 48, Claude Fable 5.1 46; the best open-weights model, Muse Spark Open, trails Gemini 4 Carbon by 28 points
  • Claude Fable 5.1 has the highest accuracy (68%), followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (66%); Gemini 4 Argon has the lowest hallucination rate (4%)
  • Rank order keeps a 0.98 Spearman correlation with v1, but scores are 1.9 points lower on average; MiniMax M3.1 Flash falls from 16 to -6 and MiMo V2.6 Pro from 8 to -5 (vendor-reported)
Read full story

Google DeepMind expands Gemini-built PlanAssist to 15 English councils after pilots cut planning assessment time by up to 58%

On October 31, Google DeepMind said PlanAssist, a Gemini-built planning tool developed with the UK government, Google Cloud and Faculty, will be made available to 12 more local planning authorities in England, bringing the total to 15 for a 12-month Beta on live applications. In early pilots at Barnet, Camden and Dorset, DeepMind says the average officer time on householder assessment tasks fell by 58%, and more than 70% of the drafted reports were approved with no edits. Planning officers keep the final decision.

Google DeepMind expands Gemini-built PlanAssist to 15 English councils after pilots cut planning assessment time by up to 58%

Key Takeaways

  • Scale: from 3 pilot councils to 15; the 12 new ones join in three cohorts for a 12-month Beta (DeepMind blog)
  • Efficiency: average officer time on householder assessment tasks fell 58% in pilots (vendor-reported; DeepMind's X post says "up to 58%")
  • Quality: more than 70% of AI-drafted reports were approved by officers with no edits (vendor-reported)
  • The UK government says, together with new rules, routine householder processing can halve from eight weeks to four, and it aims to offer the tool to every council in England in 2027 (GOV.UK)
Read full story

X discussion: is GPT-6 Astra robotics' "GPT-3 moment"? Ex-OpenAI researcher Will Depue says specialized ML got "bitter lessoned"

Over the past day, X has been debating whether GPT-6 Astra can work directly as a robot policy. Former OpenAI researcher Will Depue (whose bio lists Sora 1 and 2 and o3/4o post-training) called Astra beating specialized robotics models "deeply surprising", then described it as "the final death of specialized ML". Investor Freda Duan posted that "Astra IS robotics' GPT-3 moment", drawing about 84K views. Third-party evaluations point both ways: in a RoboDojo paper, Astra averages 22.48% success and ranks above all 40 public policies, while an EBench report puts it at 46.7%, third of nine models. This is a discussion of opinions, not an official OpenAI conclusion.

X discussion: is GPT-6 Astra robotics' "GPT-3 moment"? Ex-OpenAI researcher Will Depue says specialized ML got "bitter lessoned"

Key Takeaways

  • Reach: Will Depue's two posts have about 597 and 566 likes and 59K and 37K views; Freda Duan's "10 takes" has about 455 likes, 559 bookmarks and 84K views (as of 19:10 SGT)
  • RoboDojo: over 42 tasks and 2,100 trials, Astra averages 22.48% success (Score 28.97), ranking above all 40 public policies; GPT-5.5 gets 0.88% in the same setup (arXiv 2609.24170, as reported by the paper's authors)
  • Counterpoint: in the EBench report, Astra with single-shot in-context learning scores 46.7%, behind OpenWAM-alpha at 55.3% and AMapbot 1 at 48.9% (EBench tech report)
  • Real arms: Robocurve measured 19 of 20 successes on a block-into-bowl task on YAM arms at about $0.94 per run, but only 2 of 20 on a puzzle insertion task (Robocurve)
  • Weak spots: several evaluations find Astra clearly weaker on high-precision control, dynamic control and bimanual coordination
Read full story
ADSponsored

a16z "Rack Spread" charts: average token prices are down 67% since May while token spend is up 122%-160%, as GPU rental prices climb

a16z's Charts of the Week for Oct 30 (by Moses Sternstein) looks at the "Rack Spread": GPU rental prices are rising while token prices fall. The official a16z X account summed it up on Oct 31: since May, average token prices are down 67% and token spend is up more than 120%. By the article's napkin math, Ramp data gives roughly 122%, and Ornn's blended price multiplied by OpenRouter volume gives roughly 160%. A separate post says that since mid-July B300 rentals are up 106%, B200 up 66% and H100 up 17%. a16z also stresses that these indexes come from small, biased samples and do not show true total demand.

a16z "Rack Spread" charts: average token prices are down 67% since May while token spend is up 122%-160%, as GPU rental prices climb

Key Takeaways

  • Prices and spend: since May, average token prices are down 67% and token spend is up more than 120% (a16z post on X, a16z figures)
  • Two napkin estimates: Ramp token-spend data shows about +122%; Ornn blended price times OpenRouter volume shows about +160% (Charts of the Week, described by the author as napkin math, not a rigorous method)
  • GPU rentals since mid-July: B300 +106%, B200 +66%, H100 +17%, while average token prices fell 58% (a16z post)
  • AI spend per employee: an Atlanta Fed survey puts the mean above $1,000, while Ramp's median is $15.70 a month ($188 a year)
  • Reach: the two posts have about 371 and 492 likes and 38K and 96K views (as of 18:15 SGT)
Read full story
g
guregodevo (Memdoor author)github.com·
👀24
🔥81

Memdoor reproduces GVS5H: a team of five Qwen3.8-27B agents averages 9.8/10 on the first 10 LiveCodeBench Hard problems, against 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call

On Oct 31 the open-source coding agent Memdoor (GitHub guregodevo/memdoor, Apache 2.0) published its team-solve workflow: using the GVS5H paper authors' exact prompts and loop, five Qwen3.8-27B instances act as planner, two ideators, solver and manager, talk only through files on disk, and a script that runs the tests decides success. Over five passes on the first 10 LiveCodeBench Hard problems from the GVS5H list it averaged 9.8/10, against 9.6 for the authors' own harness and 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call; 49 of 50 runs solved the problem for $35.79 in total, and every request and reply is public. The Hacker News post has about 200 points. This is a community reproduction on only 10 problems, and the author notes that training-data contamination cannot be ruled out.

Key Takeaways

  • Score: a mean of 9.8/10 over five passes (10, 10, 10, 10, 9), against 9.6 for the GVS5H authors' own harness and 8.0 for a single Fable 5 call (team-solve README, project-reported)
  • Cost: 49 of 50 runs solved, $35.79 and 15.3M output tokens in total; a median run took about 40 minutes of model time and $0.39, the longest 4 hours
  • Method: five roles (planner, two ideators, solver, manager) plus a repair worker each start from a fresh context, talk only through files on disk, and a shell script that runs the tests decides success instead of a model
  • Limits: only 10 problems rather than the paper's 100; the contests date from March and April 2025 and may be in training data; Fable 5's column comes from the GVS5H authors' result files and was not rerun in this harness
  • Reach: the HN post has about 200 points as of Nov 1, 16:10 SGT; the original GVS5H paper is arXiv 2608.26480, which reached #1 on HN on Oct 25
Read full story

DeepSeek Harness team open-sources dsh-superagent, a proactive coding agent prototype for a single GitHub repo, alongside its Super-agent architecture article

On Oct 31, deepseek-ai open-sourced dsh-superagent-prototype on GitHub under the MIT license: a proactive coding agent that runs as a DeepSeek Harness bundle, lives on one GitHub repository and can optionally listen to Feishu. When an allowed person asks for work, it opens a work item, works in its own session and directory, and answers in the original conversation, for example with a pull request. The README states it is a research prototype, not an official DeepSeek product. The companion article, Exploring Super-agent Design, proposes a two-layer Router-Worker architecture; the team test, as reproduced by media, reports a p95 completion time of 15.7 minutes versus 29.5 minutes for a single-session setup.

Key Takeaways

  • Open source: deepseek-ai/dsh-superagent-prototype went public on Oct 31 under MIT, written in TypeScript, with about 1,800 stars at the time of writing
  • Scope: each deployment serves 1 GitHub repository, with optional Feishu; it acts only when an allowed person addresses it or a team-written rule allows it
  • Delivery: by default it only allows auto-merge for an approved pull request opened for a ticket with fewer than 200 changed lines, and never enables auto-merge as the agent account
  • Team test (as reproduced by media, vendor-reported): in a simulation with about 300 messages and 20 requests, p50 / p95 completion was 12.4 / 15.7 minutes versus 20.4 / 29.5 for a single session with a subagent tool
  • Risk: worker sessions run commands without approval as the operator's OS user, and the README asks users to review and adapt the code first
Read full story
T
Tsinghua University & Z.AI (HarnessPro, arXiv 2610.26770)arxiv.org·
👀15
🔥80

Tsinghua and Z.AI open-source HarnessPro: agents rewrite their own harness, reaching 80.8% on Terminal-Bench 2 at 34% lower cost per task

HarnessPro (arXiv 2610.26770, submitted Oct 19 and revised Oct 20), from Tsinghua University, Z.AI (Zhipu) and collaborators, is a label-free way to improve an agent harness: specialized agents diagnose execution traces, rewrite instructions and runtime policies, score candidates with LLM-generated tests, and keep Lite, Medium and Heavy harnesses along the performance-cost frontier. Per the paper, with GPT-5.5 and Codex the Heavy mode reaches 80.8% on Terminal-Bench 2, 4.5 points above the prior RHO method, while cost per task drops from $1.09 to $0.72. The code is MIT-licensed and drew wider media coverage this week, including from Pandaily.

Tsinghua and Z.AI open-source HarnessPro: agents rewrite their own harness, reaching 80.8% on Terminal-Bench 2 at 34% lower cost per task

Key Takeaways

  • Terminal-Bench 2 (GPT-5.5 with Codex, mean of 3 runs): Heavy reaches 80.8% at $0.72 per task, versus RHO at 76.3% and $1.09, a 33.9% cost cut (paper figures, arXiv)
  • Averaged over three benchmarks: +2.0 points pass rate and -26.1% cost per task versus RHO, across Terminal-Bench 2, SWE-Bench Pro and ProgramBench
  • Holds across models: with GLM-5.2 and Claude Code on Terminal-Bench 2, Heavy hits 81.4% at $0.62, versus vanilla at 74.6% and $0.92 and RHO at 78.0% and $1.00
  • Budget modes: Medium matches RHO at 76.3% on Terminal-Bench 2 for only $0.56 per task; Lite gets 72.9% at $0.43
  • Cheap to train: only 10 training tasks per benchmark and 3 to 4 evolution epochs, tested on 59, 100 and 100 held-out tasks; the three harness tiers are MIT-licensed on GitHub
Read full story

Pika releases open-weight video model Pika H3 Flex: post-trained on MiniMax H3, six-step sampling, five audio stems, API from $0.01 per second

On October 29 Pika released Pika H3 Flex, a joint audio-video generator post-trained on MiniMax H3, with weights on Hugging Face, code on GitHub, and ComfyUI and Diffusers support. Pika says it distilled sampling from 50 denoising steps to six, averages about 1.8x faster DiT denoising than Fal H3 Max at 768p, and can produce a 15-second clip with soundtrack in as little as about 7 seconds; the hosted API adds 1080p to 4K upscaling and five exportable audio stems (dialogue, score, SFX, foley, ambience). All speed and quality figures are vendor-reported.

Pika releases open-weight video model Pika H3 Flex: post-trained on MiniMax H3, six-step sampling, five audio stems, API from $0.01 per second

Key Takeaways

  • Pricing (vendor figures): text/image-to-video from $0.01 per output second, reference-to-video from $0.03/s; Pika's comparison table lists MiniMax H3 at $0.08/s and Seedance 2.5 at $0.103/s
  • Speed (vendor figures): six-step sampling, about 1.8x faster DiT denoising than Fal H3 Max at 768p on average and about 2x for 10–15 s text/image-to-video; 1.60x faster end-to-end 5 s 768p generation on eight B300 GPUs
  • Ranking: Pika's product page says it scores 1293 and ranks #7 on DesignArena's text-to-video board, the highest open-weight model there
  • Release form: the Hugging Face repo is tagged as an adapter on MiniMax-H3 under an 'other' license; local inference natively supports 480p/768p with mixed stereo audio, while 4K upscaling and audio stems are hosted-API only
  • Accepts up to 12 reference inputs (image, audio, video, sketch and more) and supports style transfer, motion transfer, character swap and targeted edits
Read full story
Linked Models & Agents:
⚡ Pika H3 Flex⚡ MiniMax H3⚡ Fal H3 Max⚡ HeyGen Video⚡ Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash🌐 Pika🌐 MiniMax