X Discussion: Eric S. Raymond Says He Deliberately Just Chats With AI to Write Code, Skipping Subagents, Skill Libraries and Software Factories, Applying the Bitter Lesson to His Own Workflow
Eric S. Raymond (ESR), the open-source figure who wrote The Cathedral and the Bazaar, posted on November 8 that he deliberately keeps his use of large language models "extremely simple, even primitive": no spawned subagents, no accumulated skills and no software factory that runs while he is away, just conversations in which he asks his "robot friend" to analyze and generate code. He says he has yet to see convincing evidence that this costs him productivity. His reasoning is that these elaborations cope with frontier models not yet being smart enough, and since models keep getting smarter, procedures with a short half-life are not worth the mental clutter. At writing time the post had about 1,300 likes, 127 replies and 26,000 views. In the same window, Box CEO Aaron Levie argued the opposite case for agent swarms.
Key Takeaways
- Original post (@esrtweet, November 8): he just converses with the model to analyze and generate code, with no subagents, skill libraries or unattended software factory, and says he has "yet to see any convincing evidence" that this costs him productivity
- Core argument: the elaborations cope with models not being smart enough yet, models keep improving, so the procedures have a short half-life; he calls this applying Rich Sutton's Bitter Lesson to his own workflow
- Engagement (public X data at writing time): about 1,316 likes, 127 replies, 78 reposts, 214 bookmarks and roughly 26,000 views
- The other side: Box CEO Aaron Levie posted the same day that agent swarms move productivity gains from "maybe 20-50%" to gains with no clear upper limit, across coding, cyber and life sciences
- Middle ground: some developers replied that you should first understand the problem through conversation and only then build a factory, while others expect harness features to keep getting absorbed into the models


